Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempt CI fix wrt broken coverage upload artifact #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

pankajkoti
Copy link
Collaborator

@pankajkoti pankajkoti commented Sep 3, 2024

Apparently the GitHub action https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact released a breaking change actions/upload-artifact#602 (not following semver guidelines) which is affecting our CodeCov job as it's no longer
able to download artifacts that were supposed to be uploaded from our tests in earlier jobs in the CI.

According to suggestion in https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/pull/607/files, set include include-hidden-files: true, so that our workflow continues to work as it was before.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.42%. Comparing base (22fb4f7) to head (204eac9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #60      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.16%   95.42%   -2.75%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         546      546              
==========================================
- Hits          536      521      -15     
- Misses         10       25      +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pankajkoti pankajkoti marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2024 20:03
@pankajkoti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cc: @venkatajagannath this seems to help

Copy link
Contributor

@venkatajagannath venkatajagannath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@pankajkoti pankajkoti merged commit fd9807b into main Sep 3, 2024
17 checks passed
@venkatajagannath venkatajagannath added this to the 0.2.1 milestone Sep 4, 2024
@pankajkoti pankajkoti mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2024
@tatiana tatiana mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2024
tatiana added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
**Breaking changes**

* Removal of ``SubmitRayJob.terminal_states``. The same values are now available at ``ray_provider.constants.TERMINAL_JOB_STATUSES``.
* Simplify the project structure and debugging by @tatiana in #93

In order to improve the development and troubleshooting DAGs created with this provider, we introduced breaking changes
to the folder structure. It was flattened and the import paths to existing decorators, hooks, operators and trigger
changed, as documented in the table below:
  | Type      | Previous import path                        | Current import path                     |
  |-----------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
  | Decorator | ray_provider.decorators.ray.ray             | ray_provider.decorators.ray             |
  | Hook      | ray_provider.hooks.ray.RayHook              | ray_provider.hooks.RayHook              |
  | Operator  | ray_provider.operators.ray.DeleteRayCluster | ray_provider.operators.DeleteRayCluster |
  | Operator  | ray_provider.operators.ray.SetupRayCluster  | ray_provider.operators.SetupRayCluster  |
  | Operator  | ray_provider.operators.ray.SubmitRayJob     | ray_provider.operators.SubmitRayJob     |
  | Trigger   | ray_provider.triggers.ray.RayJobTrigger     | ray_provider.triggers.RayJobTrigger     |


**Features**

* Support using callable ``config`` in ``@ray.task`` by @tatiana in #103
* Support running Ray jobs indefinitely without timing out by @venkatajagannath and @tatiana in #74

**Bug fixes**

* Fix integration test and bug in load balancer wait logic by @pankajastro in #85
* Bugfix: Better exception handling and cluster clean up by @venkatajagannath in #68
* Stop catching generic ``Exception`` in operators by @tatiana in #100
* Stop catching generic ``Exception`` in trigger by @tatiana in #99

**Docs**

* Add docs to deploy project on Astro Cloud by @pankajastro in #90
* Fix dead reference in docs index page by @pankajastro in #87
* Cloud Auth documentation update by @venkatajagannath in #58
* Improve main docs page by @TJaniF in #71

**Others**

Local development

* Fix the local development environment and update documentation by @tatiana in #92
* Enable secret detection precommit check by @pankajastro in #91
* Add astro cli project + kind Raycluster setup instruction by @pankajastro in #83
* Remove pytest durations from tests by @tatiana in #102
* Fix running make docker-run when there is a new version by @tatiana in #99 and #101
* Improve Astro CLI DAGs test so running hatch test-cov locally doesn't fail by @tatiana in #97

CI

* CI improvement by @venkatajagannath in #73
* CI fix related to broken coverage upload artifact by @pankajkoti in #60
* Allow tests to run for PRs from forked repos by @venkatajagannath in #72
* Update CODEOWNERS by @tatiana in #84
* Add Airflow 2.10 (released in August 2024) to tests by @tatiana in #96
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants